ぽてと🐾@政治は未来への投資
@mirai_youmeさんのX.comの記事からです！
柚子姫🐾 @消費税廃止
@pDyvhzFJAIAJe90さんのX.comの記事からです！
umekichi
@umekichkunさんのX.comの記事からです！
江田憲司議員「我が国のように消費税収全体を社会保障の財源だと言い募っている国はない。特別会計の管理をしていればまだわかるが、どこに使われているかの分からない。低所得者ほど重税感があり再配分機能を持つ社会保障の財源にあてるのは完全な論理矛盾」
— umekichi (@umekichkun) November 21, 2025
財務大臣「ご指摘の通り」
舐めてんのか pic.twitter.com/tcmCLdqLlR
☆着物リメイク☆ 京 ☆ demboさんのブログ記事からです！
消費税は悪
2025年11月2２日（土）
![消費増税とサラリーマン給与の推移グラフ
---
The main topic of the blog is "消費税は悪" (Consumption tax is evil) and it discusses how consumption tax increases have impacted wages. The image is a graph showing the "推移" (trend) of "サラリーマン給与" (salaried worker wages) in relation to "消費増税" (consumption tax increases) and "リーマン・ショック" (Lehman Shock).
The graph title is "[図表5] 消費増税で賃金が大きく下落 サラリーマン給与の推移 (2015年=100)".
Key events marked on the graph are "5%消費増税", "リーマン・ショック", "8%消費増税", and "10%消費増税". The y-axis represents the wage index (2015=100), and the x-axis represents the years from 1990 to 2021.
To create an SEO-friendly ALT text within 30 characters that accurately describes the image and incorporates keywords naturally:
1. **Identify Keywords:** "消費増税", "賃金", "給与", "推移", "グラフ"
2. **Image Content:** The image is a graph showing the relationship between consumption tax increases and the trend of salaried worker wages.
3. **Combine and Condense:**
* "消費増税と賃金推移グラフ" (Consumption tax and wage trend graph) - 13 characters. This is accurate and uses key terms.
* "消費増税で賃金下落グラフ" (Graph of wage decrease due to consumption tax increase) - 14 characters. More specific to the title's message.
* "賃金推移と消費増税グラフ" (Wage trend and consumption tax increase graph) - 16 characters.
* "消費増税が賃金に与える影響" (Impact of consumption tax increase on wages) - 16 characters. This is more descriptive of the message conveyed by the graph.
* "サラリーマン給与と消費増税" (Salaried worker wages and consumption tax increase) - 16 characters. Focuses on the key entities.
Considering the blog's emphasis on consumption tax being "evil" and the graph illustrating the negative impact on wages, a phrase that highlights this relationship is ideal. The original image title itself is "[図表5] 消費増税で賃金が大きく下落 サラリーマン給与の推移", which translates to "[Figure 5] Significant decline in wages due to consumption tax increase: Trend of salaried worker wages".
Let's try to capture the essence:
- "消費増税と賃金推移グラフ" (Consumption tax and wage trend graph) - 13 characters.
- "消費増税が賃金に与える影響" (Impact of consumption tax increase on wages) - 16 characters.
- "賃金下落と消費増税のグラフ" (Graph of wage decline and consumption tax increase) - 17 characters.
The most direct and concise representation of the graph's content, including the key concepts relevant to the blog, within the character limit is:
"消費増税と賃金推移グラフ" (Consumption tax and wage trend graph) - 13 characters.
Another strong option that implies the negative relationship is:
"消費増税で賃金下落グラフ" (Graph of wage decrease due to consumption tax increase) - 14 characters.
Given the blog title "消費税は悪", the graph visually supports this by showing a decline in wages correlated with consumption tax increases. So, emphasizing the negative impact is good.
Let's refine:
"消費増税と賃金下落グラフ" (Consumption tax and wage drop graph) - 16 characters.
This captures both the cause (consumption tax) and the effect (wage drop) and identifies it as a graph.
Final check on requirements:
- SEO effect: Uses keywords "消費増税", "賃金".
- Accurately reflects image: Yes, it's a graph showing the relationship.
- Within 30 characters: Yes, 16 characters.
- No NG words: None used.
- Policy compliance: Yes.
Alternative: "賃金推移と消費増税のグラフ" (Graph of wage trend and consumption tax increase) - 17 characters. This is also good.
Let's consider the most impactful wording related to the blog's stance. The blog implies consumption tax is bad *because* it causes wages to fall. So, "消費増税で賃金下落グラフ" directly links these two.
"消費増税で賃金下落グラフ" seems to be the best fit.
```json
{
"alt_text": "消費増税で賃金下落グラフ"
}
```](https://stat.ameba.jp/user_images/20251122/15/st1952/4b/11/p/o0535068415721886465.png)
